Vol. 34 No. 2 (2025): NJAS Special Issue: Negotiating Consent in African Studies
Special issue: Negotiating Consent in African Studies

Towards Circular Consent in African Studies: Notes on Methodology

Abdul-Gafar Oshodi
Lagos State University
Bio

Published 2025-06-23

Keywords

  • informed consent,
  • return,
  • incentivization,
  • reflexivity,
  • timing

How to Cite

Towards Circular Consent in African Studies: Notes on Methodology. (2025). Nordic Journal of African Studies, 34(2), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.53228/zhar3p59

Abstract

Consent forms are crucial in the approval of research projects by ethics committees within and outside Africa. However, the current formalization and standardization of consent inadvertently limits the ability of researchers and participants to expand the idea of agreement and navigate assent within and beyond the field. This intervention invites researchers to rethink the idea of consent – as an action, an approach, and a process – by exploring circular consent, which centres research participants in the research process. While broadening the idea of consent, circular consent offers an approach that expands participants’ agency beyond one-off forms and pragmatically accommodates changing views in the research process. Beyond discussing its four ‘legs’ (i.e., reflexivity, feedbacking, incentivization, and flourishing), the paper identifies and discusses some dilemmas that make circular consent a difficult task in the current North-South research ecosystem. By raising the issue of power, funding, and timing in the research process, this paper contributes to the debate about the functionality of consent forms as prioritized in contemporary research processes. A reflection on methodological and ethical choices in the research process, this paper stems from the author’s experience during two research projects in Ghana.

References

  1. Claude. 1979. Social Science as Imperialism: The Theory of Political Development. Ibadan University Press.
  2. Albala, Ilene, Margaret Doyle, and Paul S. Appelbaum. 2010. “The Evolution of Consent Forms for Research: A Quarter Century of Changes.” IRB: Ethics & Human Research 32 (3): 7–11.
  3. Balkin, Emma Jelstrup, Mette Geil Kollerup, Ingjerd Gåre Kymre, Bente Martinsen, and Mette Grønkjær. 2023. “Ethics and the Impossibility of the Consent Form: Ethnography in a Danish Nursing Home.” Journal of Aging Studies 64: 101110.
  4. Bell, Kirsten. 2014. “Resisting Commensurability: Against Informed Consent as an Anthropological Virtue.” American Anthropologist 116 (3): 1–12.
  5. Ben-Ari, Adital, and Guy Enosh. 2011. “Processes of Reflectivity: Knowledge Construction in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Social Work 10 (2): 152–171.
  6. Bolton, Gillie. 2010. Reflective Practice: Writing and Professional Development. Los Angeles: Sage.
  7. Bourguignon, Jean-Pierre. 2017. “Scientists, Power, and the Power of Scientists.” Simon Initiative Distinguished Lecture, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA. European Research Council, 18/04/2017. Accessed January 15, 2024. https://erc.europa.eu/news/scientists-power-and-power-scientists
  8. Bryman, Alan. 2012. Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
  9. Caelers, Di, and Dann Okoth. 2023. “Research Funding in Africa: Navigating Sustainability and Shifting Perspectives.” Nature, 14/12/2023. Accessed March 10, 2024. https://www.nature.com/articles/d44148-023-00360-4
  10. Calia, Clara, Cristóbal Guerra, Corinne Reid, Charles Marley, Paulina Barrera, Abdul-Gafar Tobi Oshodi, and Lina Boden. 2021. “Developing an Evidence-Base to Guide Ethical Action in Global Challenges Research in Complex and Fragile Contexts: A Scoping Review of the Literature.” Ethics and Social Welfare 16 (1): 54–72.
  11. Callaway, Ewen. 2017. “South Africa’s San People Issue Ethics Code to Scientists.” Nature 543 (7646): 475–476.
  12. Carlson, Julie. 2010. “Avoiding Traps in Member Checking.” The Qualitative Report 15 (5): 1102–1113.
  13. Chalmers, Iain, Michael B. Bracken, Ben Djulbegovic, Silvio Garattini, Jonathan Grant, Metin Gülmezoglu, David W. Howells, John P. Ioannidis, and Sandy Oliver. 2014. “How to Increase Value and Reduce Waste when Research Priorities are Set,” Lancet 383: 156–165.
  14. Edirisingha, Prabash Aminda, Jamal Abarashi, Shelagh Ferguson, and Rob Aitken. 2017. “From ‘Participant’ to ‘Friend’: The Role of Facebook Engagement in Ethnographic Research,” Qualitative Market Research 20 (4): 416–434.
  15. Ethics Committee for Humanities. n.d. “Ethics Committee for Humanities.” Accessed April 24, 2025. https://isser.ug.edu.gh/node/159
  16. European Parliament. 2023. “Circular Economy: Definition, Importance and Benefits.” European Parliament, 24/05/2023. Accessed on January 5, 2024. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/economy/20151201STO05603/circular-economy-definition-importance-and-benefits
  17. Gerard Forsey, M. 2010. “Ethnography as Participant Listening.” Ethnography 11 (4): 558–572.
  18. Haelewaters, Danny, Tina Hofmann, and Adriana Romero-Olivares. 2021. “Ten Simple Rules for Global North Researchers to Stop Perpetuating Helicopter Research in the Global South.” PLoS Computational Biology 17 (8): e1009277.
  19. Kadam, Rashmi. 2017. “Informed Consent Process: A Step Further Towards Making It Meaningful!” Perspectives in Clinical Research 8 (3): 107–112.
  20. Klykken, Fride Haram. 2022. “Implementing Continuous Consent in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Research 22 (5): 795–810.
  21. Langer, Arnim, Bart Meuleman, Abdul-Gafar Tobi Oshodi, and Maarten Schroyens. 2017. “Can Student Populations in Developing Countries be Reached by Online Surveys? The Case of the National Service Scheme Survey (N3S) in Ghana.” Field Methods 29 (2): 154–170.
  22. Laurie, Graeme, and Emily Postan. 2013. “Rhetoric or Reality: What is the Legal Status of the Consent Form in Health-related Research?” Medical Law Review 21 (3): 371–414.
  23. Macklin, Ruth. 1999. “Understanding Informed Consent.” Acta Oncologica 38 (1): 83–87.
  24. Mann, Traci. 1994. “Informed Consent for Psychological Research: Do Subjects Comprehend Consent Forms and Understand their Legal Rights?” Psychological Science 5 (3): 140–143.
  25. Manti, Sara, and Amelia Licari. 2018. “How to Obtain Informed Consent for Research.” Breathe 14 (2): 145–152.
  26. Mbembe, Achille. 2021. Out of the Dark Night. Columbia University Press.
  27. McIntosh, Kate, Liam Messin, Pingyue Jin, and Zoë Mullan. 2023. “Countering Helicopter Research with Equitable Partnerships.” The Lancet Global Health 11 (7): e1007–e1008.
  28. Mendizabal, Enrique. 2023. “Local Research for Local Problems – Who Gets the Money?” Ott, 08/08/2023. Accessed on March 1, 2024. https://onthinktanks.org/articles/local-research-for-local-problems-who-gets-the-money/
  29. Mortari, Luigina. 2015. “Reflectivity in Research Practice: An Overview of Different Perspectives.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 14 (5): 1–9.
  30. O’Reilly, Karen. 2012. “Ethnographic Returning, Qualitative Longitudinal Research and the Reflexive Analysis of Social Practice. The Sociological Review 60 (3): 518–536.
  31. Oshodi, Abdul-Gafar Tobi. 2023. “Framing Chinese Treatment of Africans in Guangzhou: A Study of Nigerian and Ghanaian Online Newspapers.” African Human Mobility Review 9 (2): 36–59.
  32. Plankey-Videla, Nancy. 2012. “Informed Consent as Process: Problematizing Informed Consent in Organizational Ethnographies.” Qualitative Sociology 35: 1–21.
  33. Renold, Emma, Sally Holland, Nicola Ross, and Alexandra Hillman. 2008. “‘Becoming Participant’: Problematizing ‘Informed Consent’ in Participatory Research with Young People in Care.” Qualitative Social Work 7 (4): 427–447.
  34. Robards, Brady. 2013. “Friending Participants: Managing the Researcher–Participant Relationship on Social Network Sites.” Young 21 (3): 217–235.
  35. Singer, Eleanor. 2003. “Exploring the Meaning of Consent: Participation in Research and Beliefs about Risks and Benefits.” Journal of Official Statistics 19 (3): 273–285.
  36. Thomson, S. Bruce. 2013. “Overcoming Consent form Obstacles in Qualitative Research.” JOAAG 8 (1): 52–60.
  37. VanderWeele, Tyler J. 2017. “On the Promotion of Human Flourishing.” PNAS Perspective 114 (31): 8148–8156.
  38. Wiles, Rose, Graham Crow, Vikki Charles, and Sue Heath. 2007. “Informed Consent and the Research Process: Following Rules or Striking Balances?” Sociological Research Online 12 (2): 99–110.
  39. Wong, Bonnie O., Jason Batten, Jacob Blythe, and David Magnus. 2021. “More than Conveying Information: Informed Consent as Speech Act.” The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5): 1–3.
  40. Wynn, Lisa L. 2011. “Ethnographers’ Experiences of Institutional Ethics Oversight: Results from a Quantitative and Qualitative Survey.” Journal of Policy History 23 (1): 94–114.
  41. Wynn, Lisa L., and Mark Israel. 2018. “The Fetishes of Consent: Signatures, Paper, and Writing in Research Ethics Review.” American Anthropologist 120 (4): 795–806.
  42. Zurek, Kweku. 2018. “Daily Graphic Leads Print Media Readership in Ghana – GeoPoll.” Graphic, 24/01/2018. Accessed January 10, 2025. https://www.graphic.com.gh/news/general-news/dailygraphic-leads-print-media-readership-in-ghana-geopoll.html
  43. Zutlevics, Tamara. 2016. “Could Providing Financial Incentives to Research Participants be Ultimately Self-defeating?” Research Ethics 12 (3): 137–148.