Vol. 33 No. 4 (2024): NJAS Special Issue: Becoming (Un)Equal in Age: Seniority and Superiority in African Societies
Special Issue: Becoming (Un)Equal in Age: Seniority and Superiority in African Societies

Linguistic Manifestations of Age-Grade Status in Iraqw Address Term Practices

PDF
Chrispina Alphonce
University of Dodoma
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53228/njas.v33i4.1155

Published 2024-12-19

Keywords

  • social indexicality,
  • age-grade status,
  • Iraqw,
  • address practices,
  • seniority

How to Cite

Alphonce, C. (2024). Linguistic Manifestations of Age-Grade Status in Iraqw Address Term Practices. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 33(4), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.53228/njas.v33i4.1155

Copyright (c) 2024 Chrispina Alphonce

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This study examines linguistic manifestations of age-grade status among the Iraqw, a Southern Cushitic ethnic group in northern Tanzania. It identifies how life stages or age grades are conceptually distinguished in Iraqw terminology and then looks at how the use of address terms relates to concepts of age and seniority. Based on the qualitative methods of native speaker observations and interviews, the study analyses linguistic patterns across various social interactions such as greetings, conversations, and both formal and informal acts of address. Drawing on anthropological linguistics and the pragmatics of person reference, the findings reveal that age is conceptualized in terms of social roles rather than chronological age. The obligatory use of kinship terms and titles for older individuals reflects their superiority and the honour that is due to them, while the use of proper names, pronouns, endearments, and attention-getting interjections is often the choice for juniors, signifying their lower social status. The selection of address forms reveals distinct elements across relationships, with practices varying from focusing on relational status within families to combining age and marital status in affinal ties, and emphasizing age in non-relative interactions. Nevertheless, all address practices reflect deeply rooted cultural values of respect and hierarchy. This study indicates the subtle ways linguistic choices reinforce social structures, offering insights into how language, age, and social status intersect. It also contributes to broader discussions in sociolinguistics and anthropology by examining traditional address practices.

PDF

References

  1. Afful, Joseph B. 2006. “Non-Kinship Address Terms in Akan: A Sociolinguistic Study of Language Use in Ghana.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 27 (4): 275–289.
  2. Akindele, Dele Femi. 2008. “Sesotho Address Forms.” Linguistik Online 34 (2): 3–15.
  3. Alenizi, Aied. 2019. “The Norms of Address Terms in Arabic: The Case of Saudi Speech Community.” International Journal of English Linguistics 9 (5): 227–241.
  4. Alphonce, Chrispina. 2022. “The Structure of the Iraqw Noun Phrase.” Journal of the Language Association of Eastern Africa 1 (1): 1–23.
  5. Alphonce, Chrispina. 2023. “Iraqw Personal Names and Naming Practices: Some Linguistic Observations.” Journal of African Languages and Literature 4: 73–103.
  6. Al-Qudah, Mahmoud. 2017. “The Jordanian Terms of Address: A Socio-Pragmatic Study.” SHS Web of Conferences 37 (3): 1–10.
  7. Awoonor-Aziaku, Lena. 2021. “Address Terms in Classroom Discourse: A Case of University of Cape Coast Students in Ghana.” Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 11 (3): 497–510.
  8. Bayo, Phaustini. 2023. “A Sociopragmatic Analysis of Address Terms in Iraqw.” Arusha Working Papers in African Linguistics 5 (1): 31–50.
  9. Berman, Elise. 2014. “Negotiating Age: Direct Speech and the Sociolinguistic Production of Childhood in the Marshall Islands.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 24 (2): 109–132.
  10. Cheshire, Jenny. 2005. “Age- and Generation-Specific Use of Language.” In Sociolinguistics, edited by Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus J. Mattheier, and Peter Trudgill, 1552–1563. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  11. Coupland, Nikolas. 1997. “Language, Ageing and Ageism: A Project for Applied Linguistics?” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 7: 26–48.
  12. De Cock, Barbara, and Neus Nogué Serrano. 2017. “The Pragmatics of Person Reference: A Comparative Study of Catalan and Spanish Parliamentary Discourse.” Languages in Contrast 17 (1): 96–127.
  13. Duranti, Alessandro. 1997. Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  14. Eckert, Penelope. 1997. “Age as a Sociolinguistic Variable.” In The Handbook of Sociolinguistics, edited by Florian Coulmas, 151–167. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  15. Esmae’li, Saeedeh. 2011. “Terms of Address Usage: The Case of Iranian Spouses.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 1 (9): 183–188.
  16. Fleming, Luke, and James Slotta. 2018. “The Pragmatics of Kin Address: A Sociolinguistic Universal and Its Semantic Affordances.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 22 (4): 375–405.
  17. Kraska-Szlenk, Iwona. 2009. “Emotional Aspects of Inversion in Swahili Address Terms.” In Codes and Rituals of Emotions in Asian and African Cultures, edited by Nina Pawlak, 110–127. Warsaw: Elipsa.
  18. Language of Tanzania Project (LoT). 2009. Atlas ya Lugha za Tanzania. Dar es Salaam.
  19. Lusekelo, Amani. 2021. “Linguistic Aspects of the Forms of Address in Nyakyusa.” Language in Africa 2 (1): 62–90.
  20. Makoni, Sinfree. 1997. “Age Determination and Social Structure in African Communities.” African Linguistics 21 (3): 321–335.
  21. Masruddin, Masruddin, Faisal Amir, Abbas Langaji, and Rusdiansyah Rusdiansyah. 2023. “Conceptualizing Linguistic Politeness in Light of Age.” International Journal of Society, Culture and Language 11 (3): 41–55.
  22. Mous, Maarten. 1993. A Grammar of Iraqw. Hamburg: Buske.
  23. Mous, Maarten. 2021. “The Iraqw Society Reflected in Their Language.” In The Integration of Language and Society: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, edited by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R. M. W. Dixon, and Nerida Jarkey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  24. Mous, Maarten, Martha Qorro, and Roland Kiessling. 2002. Iraqw-English Dictionary with an English and a Thesaurus Index. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.
  25. Nordbustad, Frøydis. 1988. Iraqw Grammar: An Analytical Study of the Iraqw. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.
  26. Rahmadani, Rahmadani, and Delvi Wahyuni. 2018. “Types and Functions of Address Terms Used by IPMK-SB Kampar Students Studying in Padang.” E-Journal of English Language and Literature 7 (1): 132–142.
  27. Rifai, Dian M., and Sevian T. Praseningrum. 2016. “A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Addressing Terms Used in Tangled Movie Manuscript.” Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora 17 (2): 123–134.
  28. Salihu, Hauwa A. 2014. “The Sociolinguistic Study of Gender Address Patterns in the Hausa Society.” International Journal of Social Science and Humanity 4 (1): 48–53.
  29. Snyder, Katherine A. 1997. “Elders’ Authority and Women’s Protest: The Masay Ritual and Social Change Among the Iraqw of Tanzania.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 3 (3): 561–576.