Vol. 33 No. 4 (2024): NJAS Special Issue: Becoming (Un)Equal in Age: Seniority and Superiority in African Societies
Special Issue: Becoming (Un)Equal in Age: Seniority and Superiority in African Societies

Differences of Age Without Distinctions of Authority: Marking Juniority and Seniority in a Khoisan Language

Thomas Widlok
University of Cologne
Bio

Published 2024-12-19

Keywords

  • superiority,
  • egalitarianism,
  • San,
  • kin,
  • Namibia

How to Cite

Widlok, T. (2024). Differences of Age Without Distinctions of Authority: Marking Juniority and Seniority in a Khoisan Language. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 33(4), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.53228/njas.v33i4.1144

Abstract

This contribution begins with the puzzle as to why there are kinship and naming systems that distinguish junior from senior, elaborately and systematically, even though these practices are embedded in substantially egalitarian societies. The case under investigation is that of Hai‖om, a Khoisan (Khoekhoe)-speaking group in southern Africa that shows such a combination of the elaborate encoding of age difference while at the same time providing elders with very little authority over juniors. The article briefly discusses explanations such as the possible effects of cultural domination by neighbouring groups in recent history, which could play a role, but I argue that there is little evidence for such explanations in this case. The alternative argument put forward here aims to show how birth sequence functions as a general means of social orientation. Moreover, what prevents age awareness from being turned into status distinctions are social hedging mechanisms that are enmeshed with the junior/senior distinction, particularly in practices such as cross-sex naming, but also in linguistic features such as the common use of reciprocals beyond dyads to express kin ‘belonging together’. The article concludes by outlining some general lessons derived from the Hai‖om case study in terms of decoupling seniority from superiority and gerontocracy.

References

  1. Awami, Sammy. 2023. “Of Tanzanian Politicians Demanding to Be Treated As Parents.” The Chanzo Online, 24/11/2023. Accessed November 23, 2024. https://thechanzo.com/2023/07/24/of-tanzanian-politicians-demanding-to-be-treated-as-parents/
  2. Backwell, Lucinda, and Francesco D’Errico. 2021. San Elders Speak: Ancestral Knowledge of the Kalahari San. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
  3. Barnard, Alan. 1992. Hunters and Herders of Southern Africa: A Comparative Ethnography of the Khoisan Peoples. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Biesele, Megan. 1993. Women Like Meat: The Folklore and Foraging Ideology of the Kalahari Ju/ʾhoan. Johannesburg, South Africa: Witwatersrand University Press.
  5. Bird-David, Nurit. 2022. “How Do We Scale Hunter-gatherers’ Social Networks? Towards Bridging Interdisciplinary Gaps.” In Scale Matters, edited by Thomas Widlok and Dores Cruz, 19–37. Bielefeld: transcript.
  6. Broodryk, Johann. 2005. UBUNTU: Management Philosophy. Randburg: Knowres Publishing.
  7. Cattell, Maria. 1997. “Ubuntu, African Elderly and the African Family Crisis.” Southern African Journal of Gerontology 6 (2): 37–39
  8. Cichocki, Piotr, and Marcin Kilarski. 2010. “On ‘Eskimo Words for Snow’: The Life Cycle of a Linguistic Misconception.” Historiographia Linguistica 37 (3): 341–377.
  9. Därmann, Iris. 2019. Kulturtheorien zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius Verlag.
  10. Graeber, David, and David Wengrow. 2021. The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity. London: Allen Lane.
  11. Hoymann, Gertie. 2010. “Questions and Responses in ╪Ākhoe Hai||om.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (10): 2726–2740.
  12. Kopytoff, Igor. 1997. “Ancestors as Elders in Africa.” In Perspectives on Africa, edited by Roy Grinker, Stephen Lubkemann, and Christopher Steiner, 314–322. Oxford: Blackwell.
  13. Levinson, Stephen. 2006. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Marshall, Lorna. 1976. The !Kung of Nyae Nyae. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  15. Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1924. “The Mother’s Brother in South Africa.” South African Journal of Science 21 (11): 542–555.
  16. Rapold, Christian J., and Thomas Widlok. 2008. “Dimensions of Variability in Northern Khoekhoe Language and Culture.” Southern African Humanities 20 (1): 133–161.
  17. Widlok, Thomas. 1998. “Unearthing Culture. Khoisan Funerals and Social Change.” Anthropos 93: 115–126.
  18. Widlok, Thomas. 1999. Living on Mangetti: ‘Bushman’ Autonomy and Namibian Independence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  19. Widlok, Thomas. 2000. “Names that Escape the State: Hai‖om Naming Practices Versus Domination and Isolation.” In Hunters and Gatherers in the Modern World, edited by Peter Schweitzer, Megan Biesele, and Robert Hitchcock, 361–379. New York: Berghahn Books.
  20. Widlok, Thomas. 2002. “Corporatism and the Namibian San.” In Challenges for Anthropology in the ‘African Renaissance’: A Southern African Contribution, edited by Deborah LeBeau and Robert Gordon, 206–216. Windhoek: University of Namibia Press.
  21. Widlok, Thomas. 2005. “Take it or Leave it: The Post- and Pre-Mortal Inheritance of San People in the Oshikoto Region.” In The Meanings of Inheritance. Perspectives on Namibian inheritance practices, edited by Robert Gordon, 23–38. Windhoek: Legal Assistance Centre.
  22. Widlok, Thomas. 2013. “Hai‖om Language Contact.” In The Khoesan Languages, edited by Rainer Voßen, 461–463. New York: Routledge.
  23. Widlok, Thomas. 2022a. “Introduction: Why Scale Matters.” In Scale Matters, edited by Thomas Widlok and Dores Cruz, 7–18. Bielefeld: transcript.
  24. Widlok, Thomas. 2022b. “Näher dran oder mit genügend Abstand? Ethnologie in die Praxis getrieben.” In Ethnologie als angewandte Wissenschaft. Das Zusammenspiel von Theorie und Praxis, edited by Roland Hardenberg, Jos Platenkamp, and Thomas Widlok, 45–60. Berlin: Reimer.